PDA

View Full Version : Sam Smith ranks Garnett's top suitors


60 Cent
02-28-2006, 01:36 PM
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/columnists/cs-060228smith,1,7218369.column?coll=cs-columnists

This off-season's grand prize: Garnett
But Bulls not likely to land disgruntled Timberwolves star

Published February 28, 2006

Paul Pierce would help and so would Ray Allen. It would be nice to have Al Harrington or Peja Stojakovic. One can dream about Chris Bosh or LeBron James, but they're probably not going anywhere.

The guy everyone wants is Kevin Garnett, who was fined $5,000 Monday for throwing a basketball into the stands Sunday and is at the United Center with the Minnesota Timberwolves on Tuesday night to play the Bulls. The question is where he will be next season.

The Timberwolves and Garnett mostly ignore the incessant prattling about Garnett leaving the long misguided, underachieving franchise, though there continue to be rumors and reports--TNT added another last week--that the Timberwolves wouldn't stand in Garnett's way if he wanted to be traded.

"Sounds to me like they wouldn't mind moving him but don't want the blame," offered one team executive who would like to be in on what could be the best personnel sweepstakes since Shaquille O'Neal went to Miami.

So what makes sense? Here's a look at the 10 most likely deals for Garnett this summer:

1. Los Angeles Clippers: Sorry, Bulls fans. Garnett lives in Malibu and the Clippers could put together a much better package than the Lakers. It would help them retain Sam Cassell, whom Garnett worked well with in Minnesota and can take that last shot. Watching Garnett being triple-teamed now is sad. Plus, the Clippers have what Garnett and Cassell didn't have, a center in Chris Kaman. How about Elton Brand, Corey Maggette as he returns from surgery and Shaun Livingston for perhaps Garnett and Mark Madsen, the latter to dance at the Clippers' championship rally.

2. Golden State Warriors: Figure this will be the summer they try to make the big splash, and they have the assets. They could put together something appealing with their No. 1 pick, Jason Richardson and Troy Murphy and perhaps throw in one of their European kids, like Andris Biedrins or Zarko Cabarkapa.

3. Indiana Pacers: They've got a big piece in Jermaine O'Neal, whom they probably would deal for someone like Garnett. Perhaps with one of their guards, like Jamaal Tinsley, Anthony Johnson or Sarunas Jasikevicius and a No. 1 pick, it would be enough for the Timberwolves to come away looking whole and with some assets.

4. New York Knicks: Well, they do have a lot of players. And they have two No. 1 draft picks this season, though in the bottom half, probably from Denver and San Antonio. Maybe the two No. 1s, Channing Frye, Steve Francis, Jamal Crawford and David Lee. Minnesota would have to think about it for Garnett and an extra like Madsen, and if they have bad contracts the Knicks surely would take them.

5. Los Angeles Lakers: Garnett is their rebuilding plan with Amare Stoudemire and Yao Ming having re-signed. Garnett and Kobe Bryant would be enough to be back in serious contention. Perhaps Lamar Odom, promising kid center Andrew Bynum, whomever else they may want and a No. 1 draft pick? It's not like the Lakers got that much for O'Neal. If Garnett chooses a place to go and is insistent, the Timberwolves have to get the best they can to avoid a scene. And Garnett, who some label a high-level Don Knotts-type since he is best as a supporting man in the end, badly needs a finisher to play with to have the kind of ultimate success he seeks.

6. Bulls: The Timberwolves need to build and the Bulls have pieces. The risk with Garnett is he has played more than 30,000 minutes and never is hurt. How long can he keep that up? But in the East, he could make a big difference. Perhaps the Knicks' No. 1 pick, which the Bulls own and seems certain to be in the top 5 if not No. 1, Ben Gordon, Chris Duhon and Andres Nocioni? Maybe even throw in the Bulls' other No. 1, which should be toward the middle of the first round.

The Bulls can absorb Garnett's salary with their salary-cap space. The assumption is the Timberwolves, like the Lakers did with O'Neal, would give Garnett veto over certain deals. So the question is whether the Bulls would have enough left to be a high-level competitor and be attractive to Garnett.

7. Dallas Mavericks: I've long thought this one fit. And if the Mavericks are an early playoff victim, it might make sense with their new defensive direction to offer Dirk Nowitzki and Jason Terry in a sign-and-trade.

8. New Jersey Nets: Wouldn't they love to continue to stick it to the Knicks? And they have some big pieces they can give up, like Vince Carter or Richard Jefferson. Remember, Garnett isn't going just anywhere. Figure it should be a major market or somewhere he can win. Maybe Carter, Nenad Krstic and their two No. 1s, their own and the Clippers'.

9. Philadelphia 76ers: Hard to see the Timberwolves taking on Allen Iverson, but you can assume the 76ers will make a run with him. Something like Iverson, their No. 1 pick and a piece like Andre Iguodala or Kyle Korver. Hey, people seem to go to games everywhere but Philadelphia to see Iverson.

10. Boston Celtics: This is the big strike Minnesota supposedly has been holding back for. So make it Pierce, Al Jefferson and the No. 1 pick, which would give the Timberwolves plenty to build with, though it might look a little too much like Celtics Midwest after the Ricky Pierce deal. Wally Szczerbiak and Garnett back together again?

E^2
02-28-2006, 01:50 PM
I don't belive that guys like Jermaine O'Neal and Dirk Nowitzki plus fillers are available for Garnett. Where he is at in his career I would certainly have to think long and hard about doing that. However, this is just typical Sam Smith B.S. He has talked about trading Garnett for years now.

Brewdawg
02-28-2006, 02:02 PM
Sam Smith produces an article like this on almost a weekly basis now, and he has since KG signed his first 100 million dollar contract. There is nothing new here.

WolvesFan21
02-28-2006, 02:20 PM
yea wasn't it sam smith who was always talking about wally going to chicago the last few years too? half of these deals he listed dont seem very realistic, particularly the Clippers deal with brand, maggette, and livingston(that would leave them with cassel, garnett, mobley, and kaman which isnt bad but is that really better than a healthy clippers starting 5 today?) and also the dallas deal....if they were looking to add garnett you would think they'd want to pair him with dirk and offer other pieces

TWolfTim22
02-28-2006, 02:47 PM
Sam Smith is a straight up wanker. These articles have become regulars and its funny how a guy can get payed to create this BS. I think any of us are capable of writing about fantasy deals that will most likely never happen.

What happens if KG does get traded? Most likely Sam Smith becomes a bum on the streets of Chicago since he will have nothing to write about. Just look at his Bulls trade. Again it has already been stated that they are not interested in giving up their young core to acquire KG. Their best shot was to give us the two first rounders this year and a couple of young impact players. But again, Smith keeps beating a dead horse. This guy really needs to focus more on the game of basketball. Then again he probably wouldn't have a job.

Ms. Wolf
02-28-2006, 02:50 PM
Smith just throws stuff against the wall and sees what sticks.
The Clips trade- come on- Let's depend on a 30 year old Garnett and a 37 year old Sammy to get us to the championship! Sure- Elgin Baylor would be on Glue to do that.

And for the Woofies- Brand is nice, but Magette is an injury waiting to happen, and Livingston seems to get injured sneezing.

DeROK
02-28-2006, 05:56 PM
Trading Dirk for KG, might put the Mavericks over the top, but where does it leave us? If we weren't that good with KG, how is getting Dirk going to make us better? Same thing with getting Elton Brand, Jermaine O'Neal, etc. A lot of the times, they're really a wash. And even more of the time, they're worthless, like getting Vince Carter.

If we traded KG, we'd need a rebuild from the ground up. We'd need lots of draft picks. But here's the thing: You paird KG with Kobe and the picks you're getting from the Lakers are going to be in the high 20's at least. Do you really want those? The only way to trade him is to send him to a bad team and collect the good picks, but then what's the point of doing it? He won't be happy.

Mr Wolf
02-28-2006, 06:33 PM
There is no combination of players in the NBA (not even Kobe + Shaq + Duncan) that I would trade Kevin Garnett for. I just can't picture Garnett being in another jersey. I don't care if we would be promised a championship. I want to be able to tell my kids that I saw one of the greatest role models in professional sports history play for my Minnesota Timberwolves and nobody else. Despite all the hardships that we have gone through and the pain we have had to endure, he has stayed by ourside for 10 years and I can't picture him going anywhere else.

College Wolf
02-28-2006, 07:27 PM
Trading Dirk for KG, might put the Mavericks over the top, but where does it leave us? If we weren't that good with KG, how is getting Dirk going to make us better? .


Who cares if he is happy where we trade him? IT's not like we owe him anything. He has made over 200 MILLION dollars in his career with the Wolves. And, trading someone like KG, no matter what deal we get, will not make us better. It will make it easier for us to rebuild.